Please help! i want buy a Scanner with Scanner Driver

[tonix]

Hello friends!

I want buy a Scanner with Scanner Driver. What scanners the best?

I think about RayTrack 35 Plus Scanner. It's a good scanners?

Please help me.

[tschosef]

Hello...

i am a owner of Raytrack 35 + and i think they are fine

God galvos for hobbyist....
The driver is also including a savety board!

greez
Erich

[tonix]

Hello...

i am a owner of Raytrack 35 + and i think they are fine

God galvos for hobbyist....
The driver is also including a savety board!

greez
Erich

Do you have a technical data of them? and who is produced them?

[tonix]

And maybe exist better scanners then Raytrack 35+?

[gento]

Dort werden Dir geholfen
http://www.jmlaser.com/downloads/Manual ... 35Plus.pdf

Gento

[tonix]

Dort werden Dir geholfen
http://www.jmlaser.com/downloads/Manual ... 35Plus.pdf

Gento

Thank you! i see this manual!

But i want to know data by Grad - speed. This doc is't have this.

[gento]

Speed @Ilda Norm >35K

Speed @Laserwolrd Norm up to 70 K

Gento

[tonix]

Speed @Ilda Norm >35K

Speed @Laserwolrd Norm up to 70 K

Gento

What you mean at @Laserwolrd Norm ? i don't understand it

[fesix]

It was more or less a joke.

Laserworld got used to give speed data, who are about two times higher than ILDA standart.

[tonix]

It was more or less a joke.

Laserworld got used to give speed data, who are about two times higher than ILDA standart.

Ok - thank you!

And you think that is scanner is good? or is best for graphics?

[fesix]

The Raytrack 35 are very good scanners for their price!

Of course there are better scanner for example the CT6800 or CT6210 but these are much more expensive.

[tonix]

The Raytrack 35 are very good scanners for their price!

Of course there are better scanner for example the CT6800 or CT6210 but these are much more expensive.

But i look to this tes: http://xleave.de/laser/scannertest/test.html

and CT6800 not better then Raytrack 35+

[fesix]

Oh I would say they are better.

On the ILDA testpattern you don't see a difference.

But on the other patterns I can see it.

But I would say: the Raytrack 35 are very very good scanners!

[ChrissOnline]

The best scanners I ever saw (on hobby-events) was the CT6215HB set shown by swisslas.ch
But they're 3 times more expensive than Raytracks...

For home-use, disco-use and "normal" events the raytracks are more than o.k.!
Beamshows are perfect and also grafic-shows have got very nice quality.
Much better than widemoves, lw-50 and so on.

My next option will also be: Raytrack35+
Nice price, good quality!

(or CT6215HB.... of course!!!!)

[tonix]

Oh I would say they are better.

On the ILDA testpattern you don't see a difference.

But on the other patterns I can see it.

But I would say: the Raytrack 35 are very very good scanners!

Fesix thank you very much!

[tonix]

The best scanners I ever saw (on hobby-events) was the CT6215HB set shown by swisslas.ch
But they're 3 times more expensive than Raytracks...

For home-use, disco-use and "normal" events the raytracks are more than o.k.!
Beamshows are perfect and also grafic-shows have got very nice quality.
Much better than widemoves, lw-50 and so on.

My next option will also be: Raytrack35+
Nice price, good quality!

(or CT6215HB.... of course!!!!)

ChrissOnline thank you very much!

[tonix]

Who is maybe have a video of work Raytrack scanners?