www.LaserFreak.net

Hello friends!

I want buy a Scanner with Scanner Driver. What scanners the best?

I think about RayTrack 35 Plus Scanner. It's a good scanners?

Please help me.

Hello...

i am a owner of Raytrack 35 + and i think they are fine

God galvos for hobbyist....
The driver is also including a savety board!

greez
Erich

tschosef hat geschrieben:Hello...

i am a owner of Raytrack 35 + and i think they are fine

God galvos for hobbyist....
The driver is also including a savety board!

greez
Erich

Do you have a technical data of them? and who is produced them?

And maybe exist better scanners then Raytrack 35+?

Dort werden Dir geholfen
http://www.jmlaser.com/downloads/Manual ... 35Plus.pdf

Gento

gento hat geschrieben:Dort werden Dir geholfen
http://www.jmlaser.com/downloads/Manual ... 35Plus.pdf

Gento

Thank you! i see this manual!

But i want to know data by Grad - speed. This doc is't have this.

Speed @Ilda Norm >35K

Speed @Laserwolrd Norm up to 70 K

Gento

gento hat geschrieben:Speed @Ilda Norm >35K

Speed @Laserwolrd Norm up to 70 K

Gento

What you mean at @Laserwolrd Norm ? i don't understand it

It was more or less a joke.

Laserworld got used to give speed data, who are about two times higher than ILDA standart.

fesix hat geschrieben:It was more or less a joke.

Laserworld got used to give speed data, who are about two times higher than ILDA standart.

Ok - thank you!

And you think that is scanner is good? or is best for graphics?

The Raytrack 35 are very good scanners for their price!

Of course there are better scanner for example the CT6800 or CT6210 but these are much more expensive.

fesix hat geschrieben:The Raytrack 35 are very good scanners for their price!

Of course there are better scanner for example the CT6800 or CT6210 but these are much more expensive.

But i look to this tes: http://xleave.de/laser/scannertest/test.html

and CT6800 not better then Raytrack 35+

Oh I would say they are better.

On the ILDA testpattern you don't see a difference.

But on the other patterns I can see it.

But I would say: the Raytrack 35 are very very good scanners!

The best scanners I ever saw (on hobby-events) was the CT6215HB set shown by swisslas.ch
But they're 3 times more expensive than Raytracks...

For home-use, disco-use and "normal" events the raytracks are more than o.k.!
Beamshows are perfect and also grafic-shows have got very nice quality.
Much better than widemoves, lw-50 and so on.

My next option will also be: Raytrack35+
Nice price, good quality!

(or CT6215HB.... of course!!!!)

fesix hat geschrieben:Oh I would say they are better.

On the ILDA testpattern you don't see a difference.

But on the other patterns I can see it.

But I would say: the Raytrack 35 are very very good scanners!

Fesix thank you very much!

ChrissOnline hat geschrieben:The best scanners I ever saw (on hobby-events) was the CT6215HB set shown by swisslas.ch
But they're 3 times more expensive than Raytracks...

For home-use, disco-use and "normal" events the raytracks are more than o.k.!
Beamshows are perfect and also grafic-shows have got very nice quality.
Much better than widemoves, lw-50 and so on.

My next option will also be: Raytrack35+
Nice price, good quality!

(or CT6215HB.... of course!!!!)

ChrissOnline thank you very much!

Who is maybe have a video of work Raytrack scanners?